Re: [PATCH] udevd: de-duplicate strings in rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 19:05, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 17:50, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Kay Sievers wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 22:23, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 21:20, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On my Ubuntu installation this removes 15k of duplicate strings,
>>>>>> using a temporary index of about 25k.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Great. That looks nice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats's the diff of the rule dump before and after the patch:
>>>>>  ...
>>>>>  -[] shrunk to 64896 bytes tokens (5408 * 12 bytes), 57298 bytes buffer
>>>>>  -[] dumping 5408 (64896 bytes) tokens, 5818 (57298 bytes) strings
>>>>>  +[] shrunk to 64896 bytes tokens (5408 * 12 bytes), 18204 bytes buffer
>>>>>  +[] used 40512 bytes of string index nodes (844 * 48 bytes)
>>>>>  +[] dumping 5408 (64896 bytes) tokens, 1369 (18204 bytes) strings
>>>>>
>>>> I split the nodes and the childs in two independent arrays, so we got
>>>> rid of the limit of 10 childs per node. I've got ~200 fully uses slots
>>>> with the huge rules set here. Unlimited childs in the index removes
>>>> another 3 kB of duplicates, and the temporary index seems also a bit
>>>> smaller:
>>>>   shrunk to 64896 bytes tokens (5408 * 12 bytes), 15324 bytes buffer
>>>>   used 29456 bytes for index (1076 * 16 bytes nodes, 1020 * 12 bytes
>>>> child links)
>>>>
>>>> Would be great, if you can check if it still works for you as expected. :)
>>>>
>>> Did you have a particular reason to keep the trie_root array?  Now
>>> there's no fixed limit on children, you could just use trie[1] as the
>>> root node.  Remove the special case for depth == 0.  And initialize it's
>>> value and length to 0, then you can remove the special case for len == 0.
>>>
>>
>> No special reason, I thought about that too, but it was already 5am,
>> and I was unable to think it through. :)
>>
>> Sounds nice to do that, did you try already, have a patch?
>>
> No, sorry :).

Ah, now by looking at it, maybe the then needed linear search for the
key in the root is not as good as the plain root array index?

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux