Re: [PATCH] udevd: Avoid implicit memset in match_attr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 20:13, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 16:51, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> C initializers include an implicit "others => 0" (Ada syntax).
>>> Initializing a char array to "" is equivalent to a memset()
>>> call - which is exactly what it gets compiled to.
>>>
>>> Fixing this one callsite reduced memset() _user_ cpu cycles
>>> from 2-4% to 0.05% on the EeePC.
>>>
>>> There are other occurences, but the fix isn't that pretty
>>> so I left them alone.

>>> -       char value[UTIL_NAME_SIZE] = "";
>>> +       char value[UTIL_NAME_SIZE];
>>>        size_t len;
>>>
>>>        util_strlcpy(attr, key_name, sizeof(attr));
>>> +       util_strlcpy(value, "", sizeof(value));
>>
>> Wouldn't value[0] = '\0' be even faster? :)
>
> Heh.  That would probably be clearer as well.  There's no big
> difference, use whatever you prefer.

I applied your patch, and changed all the other occurrences too. The
match_attr() is still pretty high in the profile, so we do one of the
srlcpy() now only if we need to.

Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux