Re: Loading firmware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Jasem Mutlaq <mutlaqja@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device",
>> NAME="bus/usb/$env{BUSNUM}/$env{DEVNUM}", MODE="0644"
>
> Yes, this is exactly what I have in 50-udev-default.rules.
>
>> I suspect you'll end up with something like this (make sure it runs
>> somewhere after the above rule that sets the name):
>>
>> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device",
>> ATTR{idVendor}=="xxxx", ATTR{idProduct}=="yyyy", RUN+="/sbin/fxload -I
>> /lib/firmware/foo.hex -D $env{DEVNAME}"
>
> I tried that, and now the rule wouldn't even apply. It seems that DEVTYPE=="usb_device" is not handled correctly. If I remove this condition, the rule is applied. I have one file 99-sbig.rules which has the following:
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ACTION=="add", SYSFS{idVendor}=="0d97", SYSFS{idProduct}=="0001", ENV{DEVTYPE}=="usb_device", \
> RUN+="/sbin/fxload -I /lib/firmware/sbigucam.hex -D $env{DEVNAME}"
>
> I don't understand why DEVTYPE is not caught, I ran udev monitor and got the following when I plugged my USB cam:
>
> ---------------------------------
> EVENT[1224070564.432382] add      /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:07.2/usb1/1-1 (usb)

That reads "UDEV    [...] ..." since a long time, what old version of
udev you are running? It does not look like Fedora9 or openSUSE11.
Such old udev versions might not work with device nodes created by a
kernel bus-device.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux