Before I get patching, I wanted to get a consensus about what the best patches would be, since there's a few options: a) kernel names match LANANA, using ! instead of / ACTION=add DEVPATH=/class/input/mice SUBSYSTEM=input MAJOR=13 MINOR=63 Pro: simplest, ! -> / already supported by udev Con: looks strange in sysfs; /class/input/mice becomes /class/input/input!mice; backwards compatibility? - we can match NAME=="input/mice" for permissions, this works for both! b) kernel names remain the same, include DEVNAME in environment ACTION=add DEVPATH=/class/input/mice DEVNAME=/dev/input/mice SUBSYSTEM=input MAJOR=13 MINOR=63 Pro: fixes sysfs and compatibility, attractive Con: udev needs patching, extra macro in kernel Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
