On Aug 11, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is not really a need for a compromise, we asked you to send a > patch to add that "elegance", and we will change the default rules Tell me what's missing from my rules instead, I will fix it and then you will be able to use them. If nothing is missing, then you can replace the files right now. BTW: *I* documented the semantics of the Debian rules files. From README.Debian: Since the order may be important, files have a specific name which must be considered when adding custom rules. So far have been defined: - 50: the default names are set. - 60: path_id and the other *_id programs are run. persistent links are created. - 70: network interfaces are renamed and generated rules for persistent links are processed. - 75: the rules generators are run if needed. - 80: drivers are loaded. - 91: the default permissions and owners are set. - 95: $REMOVE_CMD is run, and then processing of tty devices is stopped with last_rule. -- ciao, Marco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
