Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fixed installation path for 64-bit libvolume_id.so

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 23:35, Thomas Koeller <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> When building with 'USE_STATIC = false' in the top level Makefile, which is
> the default, a shared library is generated which of course needs to be
> installed.

It's a .a, which is a static lib, not a shared one which is obviously
installed by default. But still, why would someone need that "lib",
which is usually only build to create a static vol_id?

Kay

> On Mittwoch, 9. Juli 2008, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 08:53, Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Thomas Koeller wrote:
>> >> Installing 64-bit libraries in /lib and /usr/lib
>> >> is wrong.
>> >
>> > Fedora has the attached patch and builds on 64bit systems with:
>> > $ make libdir="/lib64" usrlibdir="/usr/lib64" ...
>>
>> This is not needed, it works fine without the patch. We all do it that
>> way for long.
>>
>> > diff -up udev-120/extras/volume_id/lib/Makefile.lib64
>> > udev-120/extras/volume_id/lib/Makefile
>> > +       $(INSTALL_LIB) -D libvolume_id.a
>>
>> What would be the point to package an intermediate internal udev build
>> file?. This is not a library, and nothing that should be distributed
>> with a package.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hotplug" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux DVB]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [X.org]     [Util Linux NG]     [Fedora Women]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux