On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:07:04AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 18:38 -0800, Mark Wong wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 04:35:52PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > Sigh.... Looks like an old CONFIG_NONLINEAR managed to stay around. > > > Please give the attached patch a shot. Thanks for all of the patience. > > > There are obviously some growing pains with the new sparsemem port to > > > the hotplug code (all my fault). > > > > Ok, how do these look? > > Those look pretty good. The section failure allocations are probably > due to memory becoming fragmented, and not allowing order-10 allocations > later in boot. This is quite expected on an i386 machine. But, that's > just a guess unless I see /proc/buddyinfo. Is this snapshot sufficient, or should I redo it after I run the tests? # cat /proc/buddyinfo Node 0, zone DMA 59 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Node 0, zone Normal 512 101 20 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0
