From: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
The wpas_p2p_nfc_handover failure test and the more specific
wps_build_nfc_handover_req_p2p were effectively the same as the matching
currently does a prefix match. The code-path tested in these two cases
only hit a single TEST_FAIL macro in openssl_digest_vector.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/hwsim/test_wpas_ctrl.py | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/hwsim/test_wpas_ctrl.py b/tests/hwsim/test_wpas_ctrl.py
index 44eb004442..cf6d3211e7 100644
--- a/tests/hwsim/test_wpas_ctrl.py
+++ b/tests/hwsim/test_wpas_ctrl.py
@@ -1880,8 +1880,6 @@ def test_wpas_ctrl_error(dev):
1, 'wpa_supplicant_ctrl_iface_wps_nfc_token'),
('WPS_NFC_TOKEN NDEF', 'FAIL',
2, 'wpa_supplicant_ctrl_iface_wps_nfc_token'),
- ('NFC_GET_HANDOVER_REQ NDEF P2P-CR', None,
- 1, 'wpas_p2p_nfc_handover'),
('NFC_GET_HANDOVER_REQ NDEF P2P-CR', None,
1, 'wps_build_nfc_handover_req_p2p')]
for cmd, exp, count, func in tests:
--
2.45.1
_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
