On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 1:19 AM Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 02:48:39AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote: > > Runtime is a bit trickier as the WPA supplicant maintains an > > aggregated scan list (maintained > > using ageing), so, if we change the criterion in between, we might > > have to flush the existing > > scan results and start afresh, hence went with compile time. > > > > But I will think more about this (this was a fresh bug) while I await > > any other feedback. > > I do not really like adding build time configuration parameters for > something like this, so I would be much more likely to apply a version > that allows configuration to be done from the runtime configuration > file. I don't see this really being toggled that frequently, but it > makes no sense for distros to be forced to distribute two different > binaries if they want to support both options. I have chosen compile time as this option is seldom changed, but I understand your point about maintaining separate binaries. I will add a runtime configuration option for the scan, thanks. _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
