On Sat, Feb 03, 2024 at 01:08:09PM +0530, harisha ja wrote: > Post reassociation success duing 2/4 message client is trying include 2 > PMKIDs in 2/4 and code is failing below with ie.num_pmkid Would you be able to share a sniffer capture showing this behavior? I would be interested in seeing the exact contents of the RSNE in (Re)Association Request frame and EAPOL-Key message 2. Is this for the FT initial mobility domain association or for PTK rekeying during an association stated through the use of FT protocol? > Is it expected that the client sends 2 pmkid in 2/4 message? in > what situation can it do so? > > In this case should AP honour 2 PMKIDs ? The IEEE 802.11 standard is somewhat vague on this front. It is possible to interpret it as indicating that there is only PMKR1Name in the list, but it looks like it would also be possible to interpret it for the FT initial mobility domain association case as containing whatever PMKIDs were included in the (Re)Association Request frame (i.e., something using for PMKSA caching) and the PMKR1Name added to the list. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
