Re: [PATCH 1/2] De-couple MBO and WNM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 10, 2023 at 12:52:04AM +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> Looks like, we need to separate out BTM code to a separate file btm.c
> and include
> it for both MBO and WNM (NEED_BTM=y). This way we can get rid of rest of the
> WNM. WDYT?

It does not have to be moved to a separate file, but it would seem
reasonable to be able to pick a subset of wnm_sta.c when CONFIG_MBO=y
without having to force CONFIG_WNM=y. For example, wnm_sta.c could be
included into the build if either CONFIG_WNM=y or CONFIG_MBO=y and then
within wnm_sta.c, some of the functions would be included based on
CONFIG_WNM and some base on either CONFIG_WNM or CONFIG_MBO. And well,
there are already couple of parts there using CONFIG_MBO on its own.

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux