> > @@ -1785,6 +1972,10 @@ void sme_event_auth(struct wpa_supplicant > *wpa_s, union wpa_event_data *data) > > } > > #endif /* CONFIG_FILS */ > > > > + /* TODO: Support for other auth_type as well */ > > + if (data->auth.auth_type == WLAN_AUTH_OPEN) > > + wpas_sme_ml_auth(wpa_s, data); > > This sounds quite problematic since IEEE P802.11be/D2.2 seems to imply that > MLO require RSN to be used and that would most likely mean SAE for cases > that do not use EAP or OWE. > WLAN_AUTH_OPEN holds for OWE as well. This "if" statement is needed to prevent going into wpas_sme_ml_auth() for other auth types as it doesn't know to properly skip over all the fixed parts in auth frame body (for SAE for example), as defined in table 9-68 (in REVme_D1.3). We have a patch that adds support for SAE, I didn't send it out meanwhile as it conflicts with the PMKSA patch from Veerendranath series. In any case I don't see where D2.2 states that open is not allowed. See for example, 11.3.5.3: " If Open System or Shared Key authentication algorithm is being used, the STA or the *MLD* shall execute the procedure described in 12.3.3.2 (Open System authentication) [...]" > What is the set of key management options this patch set is expected to > support? I'd like to start with SAE and OWE and not allow OPEN to match the > P802.11be expectations. We tested it internally with open, psk and owe. I'll send our SAE patch as well in the next series. Thanks, Andrei > > -- > Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
