Hi > That is an invalid RSNE. > While the encoding may look valid, that count=0 is not allowed based on > the standard (see IEEE Std 802.11-2020, 9.4.2.24.2). > It feels more like an implementation issue in the AP. It would be > strange to accept a configuration that would result in an invalid RSNE > being used. Thanks a lot for your clarifications. A bit sad to see that Cisco produces devices that don't follow the standards ... Confidential - Company Proprietary Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us by email by replying to the sender and delete this message. The sender disclaims that the content of this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of, any agreement; provided that the foregoing does not invalidate the binding effect of any digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is included in any attachment. _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
