Re: Bug#1003907: fails to successfully associate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Since I could easily reproduce it, I ran git bisect.

7a9c36722511ce4df88b76cceceb241d6c6a151e is the first bad commit
commit 7a9c36722511ce4df88b76cceceb241d6c6a151e
Author: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Fri Feb 28 15:50:47 2020 -0800

    DBus: Add "sae" to interface key_mgmt capabilities

    This will be present when the driver supports SAE and it's included in
    the wpa_supplicant build.

    Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


Reverting that commit on top of 2.10 I was again able to successfully establish a connection.

The debian build uses CONFIG_SAE=y.
Is it possible that wpasupplicant reports that the driver (iwlwifi) supports SAE but my hardware does not actually support SAE?

https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/support/articles/000054783/wireless.html

My network controller is an "Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6205"

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux