On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 05:39:43PM +0200, Andrei Otcheretianski wrote: > Set NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_COLOCATED_6GHZ in the scan params to enable > scanning for co-located AP's found in 2.4/5 GHz bands. > diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211_scan.c b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211_scan.c > @@ -300,6 +300,9 @@ nl80211_scan_common(struct i802_bss *bss, u8 cmd, > + /* scan for 6ghz colocated APs that reported by other APs */ > + scan_flags |= NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_COLOCATED_6GHZ; > + > if (scan_flags && > nla_put_u32(msg, NL80211_ATTR_SCAN_FLAGS, scan_flags)) Is it really correct to do this unconditionally? Wouldn't this result in undesired extra latency in scanning when the 6 GHz band is not used (e.g., for most P2P use cases) or when there is an explicit configuration (e.g., SETBAND) to disable use of the 6 GHz band? -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
