>Can you please share hostapd debug logs for a case with and without this >patch highlighting why this is needed? With https://pastebin.com/WVeeBiDD Without https://pastebin.com/VLZhJf3S Both times VHT80 requested. >And it would be called unconditionally for VHT and HE.. Is that really >correct? What if the configuration is requesting 20 MHz channel >bandwidth to be used? I can not say for sure how would it work for HE, but if i use HT20 it works correctly. Here is `iw dev' output: phy#3 Interface wlan1 ifindex 12 wdev 0x300000002 addr 7a:f0:82:62:19:11 ssid xxx type AP channel 40 (5200 MHz), width: 20 MHz, center1: 5200 MHz txpower 20.00 dBm multicast TXQ: qsz-byt qsz-pkt flows drops marks ... 0 0 0 0 0 I do realize that setting "conf->secondary_channel to be != 0" could be not the best decision, but `allowed_ht40_channel_pair' check messes everything. That's why i tried to RFC. _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
