On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 10:46 +0200, Markus Theil wrote: > This patch adds the actual extack cookie handler, which is now > used by tx control port. If these cookies are not supported by > the current kernel, a value of 0 is returned. Huh. I'm surprised this wasn't there, I used this feature before :) But I think you should reorder these patches. Put 5 and 6 first, it's pure infrastructure. > @@ -5322,7 +5362,11 @@ static int nl80211_tx_control_port(void *priv, const u8 *dest, > return -ENOBUFS; > } > > - ret = send_and_recv_msgs(bss->drv, msg, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL); > + memset(&ext_arg, 0, sizeof(struct nl80211_ack_ext_arg)); > + ext_arg.ext_data = &cookie; > + ret = send_and_recv_msgs(bss->drv, msg, > + NULL, NULL, > + ack_handler_cookie, &ext_arg); And then roll this bit into a separate patch to use it for the control port TX? Or maybe with the status handler, since it's only relevant there? johannes _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
