On 01/07/2019 15:05, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
From: Sven Eckelmann <seckelmann@xxxxxxxxx> HE (802.11ax) is also supported on 2.4GHz. And the 2.4GHz band isn't supposed to use VHT opers. Some codepaths in wpa_supplicant will therefore not initialize the freq->bandwidth or the freq->center_freq1/2 members. As a result, the nl80211_put_freq_params will directly return an error (-1) or the kernel will return an error due to the invalid channel definition. Instead, the channel definitions should be created based on the actual HT/VHT/none information. Fixes: ad9a1bfe788e ("nl80211: Share VHT channel configuration for HE") Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <seckelmann@xxxxxxxxx> --- v2: Fixed Signed-off-by: Cc: John Crispin <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> @John, please inform me when there is some kind of dependency to NL80211_ATTR_CHANNEL_WIDTH (in contrast to NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_CHANNEL_TYPE) which is required to get HE working. Or if I missed some other behavior which requires VHT and HE to use the same codepath here. src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c index 45835a21b..1c445fae9 100644 --- a/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c +++ b/src/drivers/driver_nl80211.c @@ -4352,7 +4352,7 @@ static int nl80211_put_freq_params(struct nl_msg *msg, wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, " * vht_enabled=%d", freq->vht_enabled); wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, " * ht_enabled=%d", freq->ht_enabled);- if (freq->vht_enabled || freq->he_enabled) {+ if (freq->vht_enabled) { enum nl80211_chan_width cw;wpa_printf(MSG_DEBUG, " * bandwidth=%d", freq->bandwidth);
this will make HE mode not work. would simply adding a check for !2.4ghz not be better ?
John _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
