Re: [PATCH 0/3] HE: add support for mesh mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday, 23 June 2019 17:31:25 CEST Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> >   wpa_supplicant: Fix type for ssid->mode comparisons
> >   nl80211: Add driver multi iftype HE capability parsing
> >   mesh: add support for HE mode
> 
> Thanks, applied.

Sorry about not writing about the dependency to 
"HE: fix he_capabilities size" [1] in the cover letter. But it seems that you 
have noticed this because I saw that you solved the merge conflict caused by 
this missing patch.

For everyone else: We need to fix the problem of the incorrect size check in 
copy_sta_he_capab before this will actually work with ath11k.


Btw. thanks for fixing all the ieee80211 typos. Am not 100% sure where 
following changes came from:

    @@ -798,8 +799,9 @@ int hostapd_start_dfs_cac(struct hostapd_iface *iface,
            struct hostapd_data *hapd = iface->bss[0];
            struct hostapd_freq_params data;
            int res;
    +       struct hostapd_hw_modes *cmode = iface->current_mode;
     
    -       if (!hapd->driver || !hapd->driver->start_dfs_cac)
    +       if (!hapd->driver || !hapd->driver->start_dfs_cac || !cmode)
                    return 0;
     
            if (!iface->conf->ieee80211h) {
    @@ -812,8 +814,8 @@ int hostapd_start_dfs_cac(struct hostapd_iface *iface,
                                        vht_enabled, he_enabled, sec_channel_offset,
                                        oper_chwidth, center_segment0,
                                        center_segment1,
    -                                   iface->current_mode->vht_capab,
    -                                   &iface->current_mode->he_capab[IEEE80211_MODE_AP])) {
    +                                   cmode->vht_capab,
    +                                   &cmode->he_capab[IEEE80211_MODE_AP])) {
                    wpa_printf(MSG_ERROR, "Can't set freq params");
                    return -1;
            }

Seems like this was important to you to get this changed. Just find it odd 
that I only knew about this because I noticed that my patch was silently 
modified. And then I find something (the "if") in it which is not self 
explanatory and might be an actual bug fix for a different problem which is 
now hidden in this larger patch.

Kind regards,
	Sven

[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1109462/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux