Re: [PATCH 1/2] HE: fix HE operation field size

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 04:57:48PM +0200, John Crispin wrote:
> The current code will always use the size required when all optional
> elements are present. This will cause the linux kernel to consider the
> field to be malformed if the elements are not actually flagged as being
> present.

Thanks, applied. I left patch 2/2 into my queue for some more review and
testing.

By the way, do you have means for testing these properly with
mac80211_hwsim? I added a minimal test case to check that the HE
elements show up in Beacon frames, but it did not look like the issue
mentioned in this patch 1/2 was showing up there and the station side
does not show any sign of trying to use HE either.

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux