Re: [PATCH 43/50] tests: Add WPA-EAP-SUITE-B-192 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2019-01-26 at 13:13 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 04:46:23PM +0900, Masashi Honma wrote:
> > Fix wpas_config_file_key_mgmt and sigma_dut_suite_b failure.
> > diff --git a/tests/hwsim/example-hostapd.config b/tests/hwsim/example-hostapd.config
> > @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ CFLAGS += -DCONFIG_RADIUS_TEST
> >  CONFIG_SUITEB=y
> > +CONFIG_SUITEB192=y
> > diff --git a/tests/hwsim/example-wpa_supplicant.config b/tests/hwsim/example-wpa_supplicant.config
> > @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ CONFIG_TESTING_OPTIONS=y
> >  CONFIG_SUITEB=y
> > +CONFIG_SUITEB192=y
> 
> Suite B 192-bit support was disabled by default on purpose due to
> requirements for newer libraries. If a test case fails without
> CONFIG_SUITEB192=y there is an issue in that test case and it should be
> fixed instead (i.e., raise HwsimSkip("explanation..")).

Like I just mentioned on IRC, there actually is, the test
"wpas_config_file_key_mgmt" assumes it can do suite-b-192 things.

What does "newer libraries" mean though? I'd rather have the defaults be
with as much coverage as possible, and let people who need it strip down
the config, perhaps with some comments there regarding it?

johannes


_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux