Re: OWE implementation questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 09:54:48AM -0800, James Prestwood wrote:
> I am most likely missing something here since OWE appears to work
> reliably between wpa_supplicant and hostapd, but I am confused in how
> either sides compute the full public key using only the X coordinate
> sent in the associate frame.

Did you go through the OWE RFC and the RFCs it references for ECC?

> It is my understanding that compressed coordinates also require the Y
> sign bit in order to uncompress into a full X/Y coordinates (the full
> public key). In both wpa_s/hostapd only the X coordinate is sent, and
> not including the Y sign bit. I see that openSSL is used to uncompress
> the point to regain the full public key, but when this is done "y_bit"
> is hard coded to zero. See:
> 
> hostapd/src/crypto/crypto_openssl.c:crypto_ecdh_set_peerkey
> 
> I am by no means an ECC expert, but from what I have researched I don't
> see how you can reliably choose the correct Y coordinate without
> knowing the original Y sign bit. Hard coding this to zero *shouldn't*
> work (yet it appears to).
> 
> Again, I must be missing something here otherwise OWE would only work
> ~50% of the time. Could someone clarify how this works?

RFC 6090, Appendix C (Why Compact Representation Works)

-- 
Jouni Malinen                                            PGP id EFC895FA

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux