> > Also posted this in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=175401. > > > According to the wpa_supplicant AP scoring, it would indeed seem that the 2.4GHz AP > is proffered since it has better SNR (although the SNR for both is good. Generally, > wpa_s considers any SNR above 30 as good). > > a0:55:4f:66:d5:18 freq=2447 qual=0 noise=-89~ level=-49 snr=40* flags=0xb age=0 est=65000 > a0:55:4f:66:d5:10 freq=5240 qual=0 noise=-92~ level=-67 snr=25 flags=0xb age=0 est=390001 > > perhaps the scoring can be tweaked to more aggressively favor 5.2 in case of close good SNR. > The fact that I get four times the throughput (as per iperf) without changing anything except the frequency would seem to indicate that the wpa_supplicant algorithm could use some adjustment? _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
