2017-02-05 13:55 UTC+03:00, Jouni Malinen <j@xxxxx>: > On Sun, Feb 05, 2017 at 08:53:33AM +0300, Rostislav Devyatov wrote: >> The README file of wpa_supplicant says: >> >> See defconfig file for an example configuration and a list of >> available options and additional notes. >> >> Do I understand correctly that defonfig file does NOT contain the >> COMPLETE list of available (and officially supported) configuration >> options? Is it possible to see the complete list of officially >> supported options somewhere? > > There is no such list of "officially supported" options or even > definition of what that would mean. > > wpa_supplicant/defconfig lists large portion of the available build > configuration parameters. As noted in comments for some of those > parameters, there is also experimental code that should not really be > considered supported or appropriate for production use. Thank you for reply. I understand that there are configuration parameters that are marked "experimental" in defconfig. But there are also parameters that occur in source files (using #ifdef), but not mentioned in defconfig at all. And my question is: are they even more "experimental" than those marked "experimental" in defconfig? In other words, there are release versions (the latest is 2.6), and they work "stable" (with a certain level of stability, let's say). Will they work with the same or similar level of stability if wpa_supplicant is built with these configuration parameters, which are not mentioned in defconfig at all? CONFIG_IBSS_RSN was maybe not a very good example, because it is already in defconfig (not in the defconfig of the latest release though), but there are other examples of such options: CONFIG_EAP_TLV, CONFIG_EAP_EXE, CONFIG_BGSCAN_SIMPLE, CONFIG_BGSCAN_LEARN, CONFIG_DRIVER_ATMEL, CONFIG_DRIVER_HOSTAP, CONFIG_DRIVER_IPW, CONFIG_DRIVER_RALINK. >> I am particularly interested in the option called CONFIG_IBSS_RSN. It >> is not present in defconfig (and not in README either), but it appears >> in Makefile and in several C files >> (as #ifdef CONFIG_BSS_RSN). Is this option supported? Or the fact that >> it is not present in defconfig means that it is not yet supported and >> intended to be "N" until it appears in defconfig? > > This was added to defconfig recently: > http://w1.fi/cgit/hostap/commit/?id=913c3e1e83c9efa7a4d3a4df8d20e687918fcf1d > > -- > Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA > _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
