> On 20 Jan 2017, at 4:32 AM, Hatano, Tomoharu (Sony Mobile) <Tomoharu.Hatano@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > After I confirmed from our log, it took around 110ms in worst case. > So, it looks 200ms is enough for fix. > And it may depend on the implementation of chip vendor. Thanks! > Can we continue to discuss it if we change the timeout of the patch from 900ms to 200ms? Yes, it makes sense to me to increase the delay from 100 to 200 ms based on the clear example that was not covered by the current time limit. - Jouni _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
