On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 11:46 +0300, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 07:07:42PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote: > > On Sa, 2016-09-24 at 23:07 +0200, M. Braun wrote: > > > With respect to the changes from Benjamin Berg from 2016-09-19, I > > > don't think > > > they really supersede this series, but they are not really > > > superseded by this > > > series either. I can rebase this series on that series if needed. > > > > > > Regarding using R0-Identifier = R0-BSSID: This series uses an > > > extra broadcast > > > step, but does not interfere with RADIUS NAS-Identifier. > > > > > > Your implementation seems sane to me, and I don't see any advantage > > of > > having two separate solutions for the same issue. I'll run some > > test > > using your patchset. > > > Should I interpret this as an indication to drop your earlier patch > set > (6 patches) and only focus on reviewing these 33 patches (and the > related followups)? Yes, feel free to drop those patches. The 33 patches patchset is more comprehensive and has the advantage of not requiring a fixed NAS-id. Benjamin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
