On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Arran Cudbard-Bell <a.cudbardb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 11 Aug 2016, at 08:35, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> This being a fairly niche feature, perhaps it should get a build time >> option so the code can be excluded? Even things almost everybody wants >> like 11N have build time options, and this one seems to be much more >> likely to not be desired in all builds. Thoughts? > > I think the techniques Avery described in his presentation (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZcHbD84j5Y) > are equally useful in Education, Enterprise and Carrier deployments and are not at all niche. > > If signature definitions were bundled, and the determination/confidence info were inserted into an attribute like > Connect-Info (or a hostapd VSA - I’m sure Alan DeKok will comment on appropriate attribute usage), you’d > see very widespread adoption and use. It’d represent an ultra low barrier to the sort of analysis Google are > doing on their ISP network. Although I agree that the feature is awesome, I also agree that not everyone will want it, so it still makes sense to make it optional I guess :) Have fun, Avery _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
