Re: On the proper use of the FST functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:02:36 +0300,
Petko Bordjukov wrote:
> My setup is a system with two phys - one in the 2.4 GHz band and one in the 5
> GHz one. There is a single interface in managed mode on each of them.
>
> Is it possible for FST to be used in this scenario and what is the proper way of
> configuring hostapd in order to use it?

I was able to run hostapd with FST in this scenario, just had to have one config
file per interface and start the hostapd instance with both of them as parameters:

    hostapd phy0.conf phy1.conf

Now on to the next issue. Currently hostapd does not seem to add the MB IE to
any secondary BSSes that are configured on a given interface. Does it make sense
to be able to define an FST group per BSS instead of per interface?

---

Regards,
P.

Attachment: pgpH2frmT_6a3.pgp
Description: OpenPGP Digital Signature

_______________________________________________
Hostap mailing list
Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux