On Sa, 2016-03-26 at 10:53 +0200, Jouni Malinen wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 08:26:07PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > > Looks like it went the other way around, look at commit > > 66f1c44887ba4f47d617f8ae21cf8e04e1892bd7 > > Author: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@xxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue Nov 4 11:21:21 2014 -0800 > > > > bridge: include in6.h in if_bridge.h for struct in6_addr > > > > (from the kernel) > Great.. The discussion behind that was long enough that I didn't even > want to go through it all.. It looks like there are changes both in > the > kernel and glibc to make this work. I think I'll just apply this > patch > instead and forget that linux/if_bridge.h even exists.. > > There are not really that many linux/*.h files included and it might > make sense to get rid of more or less all those includes at least > outside src/drivers/* if this type of sudden breakage can be expected > to > continue in the future. > The kernel headers have a hardcoded compatibility fix for glibc (linux/libc_compat.h): http://wiki.musl-libc.org/wiki/FAQ#Q:_why_am_i_g etting_.22error:_redefinition_of_struct_ethhdr.2Ftcphdr.2Fetc.22_.3F Getting rid of the linux headers would at least increase portability for non-glibc libraries. Best regards Jörg Krause _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
