On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:02:39AM +0100, Zefir Kurtisi wrote: > We have been using this modification (slightly updated) in our systems for half a > year now and it works as expected. I'll update the RFC and re-post it as patch. Thanks. > While at that, I could add a dedicated state HAPD_IFACE_NOP instead of combining > state and cac_started as NOP indication. Would help readability a bit. Preference? If it does not make the changes significantly more complex, it'd probable be a good idea to make it clearer why the "extra" wait is ongoing. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
