On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:58:07PM +0000, Nick Lowe wrote: > Remove os_random() and refactor its callers to use os_get_random(...) Why? This looks like unnecessary increase in use of more CPU heavy operation for things that should not need os_get_random(O level of PRNG. If there are places here that really need a strong PRNG, those should be clearly identified and addressed one-ny-one. If at the end of such an exercise there are no remaining caller of os_random(), than function can be removed in the end of such a patch set. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA _______________________________________________ Hostap mailing list Hostap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/hostap
