Re: [Patch 1/3] CLD: End-to-end verbosity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:36:32 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 04/06/2010 11:32 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:40:33 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik<jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
> >
> >> The debug levels are
> >>
> >> 	0: key messages affecting server operation, only
> >> 	1: debugging output enabled, sans per-packet output
> >> 	2: debugging output enabled, including per-packet output
> >
> > The previous patch did just that:
> > Why did you reject it?
> 
> That's a damned good question.  I have no idea.  Did I ever reply to 
> that patch?  It looks like I fscked up and missed it?

Apparently no reply (by e-mail):
http://marc.info/?l=hail-devel&m=126575343714155&w=2

I recall you said that "users hate bitmasks" on IRC or in other thread,
so I thought that -D and -v would be right (effectively a bitmask but
no hexadecimal at least).

-- Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe hail-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Clound]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux