Re: [Patch 1/1] CLD: Introduce the "New CLD" API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/08/2010 09:17 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:06:17 -0500
Jeff Garzik<jeff@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

-	if (cldc_getaddr(&host_list, hostb, NULL))
+	if (cldc_getaddr(&host_list, hostb,&ncld_log))
   		return 1001;

Logging pointer should be supplied by the caller...  that is the larger
bug.  Needing a no-op log function is just an indication of that.

I did it before, but then every client, without exception, needed
to include<stdarg.h>  and provide the log. And what for? This is
STUPID and proof is in the pudding: your getsrvinfo does not do
anything of the sort.

Possibly true -- but it is worse to introduce internal inconsistencies. It is far better to remove debugging statements completely than to create inconsistent usage.


Might as well replace cldc_getadd with getsrvinfo
and then everyone becomes happy.

Seems a good fit :)

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe hail-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Clound]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux