On 01/05/2010 11:02 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:13:36 -0500
Jeff Garzik<jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
applied... chunkd needs these fixes also, yes?
No, it appears correct as-is. Although, the large-object test in
the suite does not check the data it transmits, so if chunkd were
broken, we might not know it. On the other hand, the fact that
tabled stores test objects in chunkservers assures us that it
works at least as far as tabled's tests verify.
I was thinking specifically that chunkd may want the in-progress xfer
codes changes in your patch. chunkd, tabled, nfs4d (and ancient
storaged) all share the same basic write-in-progress and TCP data xfer code.
I'll take a look, no need to worry about it yourself.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe hail-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
