Yes it is. Do something like: ssh -C -L 10000:127.0.0.1:10000 me@remote_broadway_server I also posted recently on a way to get multiplexed connections and SSL/TLS termination: https://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/ I'm trying to make some time to implement a complete solution, with an authentication+cookie database and configurable redirection ( ie to multiple broadway applications ), but free time is hard to come by. Dan On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Igor D <ivbsd1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to forward connection from web browser to Broadway display > server via SSH ? > > Thanks, > Igor > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak.dk@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> Unfortunately, no there is no way to do this. *If* copy + paste were >> implemented between a broadway app and the browser, then you could at >> least push a link to a file to download into the browser, and the user >> could copy it and paste it into a new tab. Anyway, copy + paste is not >> implemented yet ( Hi devs ... if this is easy, it would be pretty >> damned handy ). >> >> I haven't had to do anything like this yet, but if I had to tomorrow, >> I'd get users to enter an email address in a config screen, and I'd >> email documents or links to downloads to them. Not ideal, I know. >> >> Dan >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Igor D <ivbsd1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway. >> > I need to upload and save some file on local computer (which run >> > browser). >> > Can I do in this mode that and how ? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Igor >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Igor D <ivbsd1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Dan, >> >> >> >> I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work >> >> only after triggers from user. >> >> >> >> I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck. >> >> >> >> Your inputs are optimistic :-) >> >> >> >> Thanks a lot for the help. >> >> Igor >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak.dk@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivbsd1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> > Hi, >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks for prompt reply. >> >>> > >> >>> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns: >> >>> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect >> >>> > something >> >>> > reasonable. My few experiments show >> >>> > that performance may be too low. >> >>> >> >>> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I >> >>> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very >> >>> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the >> >>> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start >> >>> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly >> >>> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to >> >>> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real" >> >>> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are >> >>> you considering distributing? >> >>> >> >>> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time >> >>> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text >> >>> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app >> >>> that sits still and waits for a user to do something. >> >>> >> >>> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than >> >>> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty >> >>> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly. >> >>> >> >>> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found >> >>> > few >> >>> > minor >> >>> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more. >> >>> >> >>> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set >> >>> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and >> >>> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't >> >>> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have >> >>> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth >> >>> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11. >> >>> >> >>> Dan >> >>> >> >>> > >> >>> > Thanks, >> >>> > Igor >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak >> >>> > <d.j.kasak.dk@xxxxxxxxx> >> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget >> >>> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security >> >>> >> is >> >>> >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( >> >>> >> 1 >> >>> >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this >> >>> >> topic a little while back: >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/ >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Are you after some info in particular? >> >>> >> >> >>> >> Dan >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivbsd1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> >> > Hi, >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with >> >>> >> > Broadway. >> >>> >> > I'll be glad to have feedback. >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > Thanks >> >>> >> > Igor >> >>> >> > >> >>> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >>> >> > gtk-list mailing list >> >>> >> > gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx >> >>> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list >> >>> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > gtk-list mailing list >> > gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
