Re: Is gtk-fb still actively maintained?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Saturday, March 12, 2016, Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi;

On 12 March 2016 at 15:07, Woody Wu <narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Does the ability of gtk can run directly on a frame buffer without X sill be
> actively developed and supported?

No, it hasn't been developed in a very, very long time. The
framebuffer backend has been removed ages ago in the 2.x series, and
it's not available on 3.x; same for the DirectFB backend.


Thanks for the info. It saved my time.

 
> I am hesitate to install a Xorg sever on a
> small device.  Thanks.

I don't see the issue. If it can run GTK then it most definitely can run X.

Yes, it can, but need more space and memory.
 

Ciao,
 Emmanuele.

--
https://www.bassi.io
[@] ebassi [@gmail.com]


--
Life is the only flaw in an otherwise perfect nonexistence
    -- Schopenhauer

woody
public key at http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371 (narkewoody@xxxxxxxxx)


_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

[Index of Archives]     [Touch Screen Library]     [GIMP Users]     [Gnome]     [KDE]     [Yosemite News]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux