Hi, On 01/20/2015 05:11 PM, Tarnyko wrote: > Hi, > I have an access to the "win32builder.gnome.org" machine, but it uses my > private SSH key. I guess you have to ask for access for another > account/key. > It is more a question of whether you, or anyone interested in this > discussion, feels able to maintain the bundle (I mean, for more than a > few releases) and keep presence on IRC and the mailing lists to answer > requests I gave it some thought and I would like to give a try to maintaining the official Win32/64 bundle to make it usable for Wireshark and others. If you accept my help to whom should I have to send my public ssh key? I'm already maintaining Wireshark and other packages in Debian and probably I won't mess up the server. :-) Cheers, Balint PS: I'm not an IRC guy but I read act on emails. > Regards, > Tarnyko > Bálint Réczey writes: >> Hi Anatoly, >> 2015-01-17 9:11 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik <techtonik@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Gian Mario Tagliaretti >>> <g.tagliaretti@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On 3 January 2015 at 21:06, anatoly techtonik <techtonik@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Win32 download page at http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php lists >>>>> GTK+ 3.6.4 as the current maintained version, but >>>>> http://win32builder.gnome.org/ also lists 3.8.2 and 3.10.4 as >>>>> available. Is that intentional? >>>> >>>> you can also use MSYS2 [1] to have the latest GTK+ and a lot more >>>> goodies, currently 3.14.6 [2] >>>> [1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/ >>>> [2] https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages >>> >>> Thanks for the pointers. I am more concerned with that most people on >>> Windows use outdated Gtk+ version, rather than with where is the >>> bleeding edge. Is there something that could be fixed in build system >>> to update Windows download pages with links to latest stable versions >>> automatically? >> >> I think this is the latest status of the Windows builds: >> https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2014/06/26/gtk-builder-for-windows/ >> If the builds are OK, you need to convince the GTK+ devs to build them >> on their official build system and put them online, like Tanyko did. >> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695600 >> Cheers, >> Balint >> _______________________________________________ >> gtk-list mailing list >> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
