On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:14:47 +0700 Lothar Scholz <llothar@xxxxxx> wrote: Hiya Lothar, > Is it really? I'm watching it for 5 years now at it is always in > terrible broken state. Definitely a no for me. Well, I'm optimistic (by nature)... :-) > Forget it. Neither you nor any customer of you will get happy with > GTK+ on MacOSX. Huh, yor message bears different color than Paul's. > The only ways are > 1) WxWidgets wxD is not very developed. > 2) Maintain two GUI's. Write a small abstraction layer for your > required widget functionality and then put the window creation stuff > (which is the most toolkit specific) into a different module for each > platform. Thats how i did it, but yes it's very expensive. 6 men > months for us. Too expensive for me. > 3) Just develop for one platform and do this with 100% quality. Well, 'boss' wants Win & Mac support. > 4) Dont' care about native Apps and play the GUI Nazi. How good is GTK+ in this scenario? Sincerely, Gour -- The embodied soul may be restricted from sense enjoyment, though the taste for sense objects remains. But, ceasing such engagements by experiencing a higher taste, he is fixed in consciousness. http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
