Re: g_strcmp0

[Milosz Derezynski <internalerror@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well, to be honest, the g_ stuff serves as an abstraction layer; I don't think that currently there is any problem with using the plain C type instead of the g_ type in this (or other) functions, but for consistency's sake and for the case that this typedef will become more complex depending on other platforms supported in the future I would consider this a minor bug and opt to get it fixed.

2010/8/31 David Nečas <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:49:26PM -0300, John Williams wrote:
> As the documentation
> (http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/2.24/glib-String-Utility-Functions.html#g-strcmp0)
> the g_strcmp0 requires const char instead const gchar and returns int
> instead gint.

Does it matter with

typedef char   gchar;
typedef int    gint;

?

These types correspond exactly to the standard C types; they are defined
only for convenience (you can put g- before everything), see their
documentation.

Yeti

_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

-- 
Please note that according to the German law on data retention,
information on every electronic information exchange with me is
retained for a period of six months.

[Bitte beachten Sie, dass dem Gesetz zur Vorratsdatenspeicherung zufolge
jeder elektronische Kontakt mit mir sechs Monate lang gespeichert wird.]
_______________________________________________
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list