Hi. >>> Especially striking is that Ubuntu doesn't have a libglib-XXX.so at all, >>> but only a libglibmm-XXX.so! >> >> I'm not sure why you cannot find it, by all my machines have at least >> libglib-2.0.so, libgtk-x11-2.0.so, libgobject-2.0.so ... Are you sure >> glib shared object is not present? > > Yes, it's not there. Maybe it's because I've not installed Ubuntu. I'm just > using the latest live CD (10.04). This CD only has the said > libglibmm-2.4.so.1, > not a libglib-2.0.so. Well, I'm almost sure that applicatons that link against libglibmm-2.4.so or ligbgtk-x11-2.0.so also need to link against libglib-2.0.so, so I'm not sure how live CD is working. But if you check your system for libglib-2.0.so, libgtk-x11-2.0.so ..., you should be fine. Those files are usually only links to real objects, but if glib/GTK+ is installed, they will be present. >> >> As for optional GTK+ support, wouldn't be better to check for GTK+ at >> configure phase and compile/link your application accordingly? > > Not possible because my app is currently not open source. Which probably means that you'll be distributing binaries. So you can compile two versions of your app: one that links against GTK+ and the one that doesn't. Your clients can then decide which one to use. Tadej -- Tadej Borovšak tadeboro.blogspot.com tadeboro@xxxxxxxxx tadej.borovsak@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
