В сообщении от 9 апреля 2010 18:01:46 автор Michael Torrie написал: > On 04/09/2010 08:29 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > So, no one works on fixing DirectFB backend, am I right? > > Seems to me that DirectFB has fallen out of favor and that many embedded > projects use the tiny Xephyr X server instead. I don't see how DirectFB > has any advantage over X11 in terms of speed or size. Given this, I'm > not surprised that GTK DirectFB has been allowed to languish. > > Have you considered Xephyr and the normal X11 GTK? Well, actually I need gtk+ ontop of DirectFB for two reasons: first board has accelerated DirectFB driver (and 128mb of RAM), and second has only 32mb of RAM (and no accelerated DirectFB driver) I'll need to write X graphics driver to get advantage of 2D accelerator for first board in case of X usage. As for second board - 32 mb is definitely not enought for X-based environment :( Regards Vasily
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
