Why not wait for the stable version of GLib to produce the stable Gtk lib (especially if the next stable version of the Glib is coming soon) ?
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, Tor Lillqvist <tml@xxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Tor Lillqvist <tml@xxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...
> To: "IMS" <ims77.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 3:04 AM
> > Is it usual to release a stable
> version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on
> > development librairies like Glib ???
>
> If you don't like it, feel free to wait then for GLib
> 2.24.
>
> --tml
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
Nonsense.
In the 'gnome' world _stable_are the ones which have even minor version
and as _stable_ they should depend on _stable_ libraries which also have
even minor version.
A stable release depending on unstable libraries by definition is not
stable.
Regards,
Sergei.
_______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
