Thanks, But why is it a disastrous idea? When It's a clear programming error, why not abort the program with g_assert? Am Mittwoch, den 20.01.2010, 12:23 -0500 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod: > On 01/20/2010 12:28 PM, Martin Kalbfuß wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't understand the need for g_return_if_fail like functions. Why not > > use g_assert here? > > > > In pure C, I used either assert for programming errors or returned an > > error indicator for expected errors. But where to use g_return_if_fail? > > g_assert aborts the process, g_return_if_fail() doesn't. It's a disastrous > idea to g_assert() in a library for example. > > > > behdad > > > > Thanks. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
