frederico schardong wrote: > I like C sintax, but is it that create this confusion to me... Thanks > for clearly, and I agree that GTK is OO. Take a look at Vala[1]. I think you'd like it. It compiles to C code, so there is zero overhead. Vala syntax itself is basically C with object-oriented syntactical sugar. Most distros have a reasonably updated version of Vala in their repositories. Certainly if you want to make your own GTK widgets that derive from other widgets, or make your own object-oriented, GObject-based code, Vala is very handy. As OO as GTK is, creating new classes in straight C is very ugly. Vala-generated code can be used in straight C programs directly. If you made a new Vala class called "foo," for example, it automatically provides the C-style methods like: foo_new() Vala has an advantage over C++ in that any Vala classes you create can be used by any of the language bindings (in theory), whereas C++ classes cannot be used easily by C code. [1] http://live.gnome.org/Vala _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
