Yes, it does. But as far as I can tell, implementers of the interface cannot override the GParamFlags of an interface property with some superset. Effectively, implementers can only override the property's getter/setter. Please let me know if I've got that wrong. This is why it seems I could only go with the lowest common denominator of GParamFlag settings in the interface definition. Which I agree makes a total mess of the 'is-a' paradigm - which is something I'm trying to avoid. Matt. On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 20:35 +0100, David Nečas wrote: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 07:30:42PM +0000, Matthew Bucknall wrote: > > Seems to me, it should be perfectly acceptable to define a property that > > can be set at construction, but then only read during the rest of the > > owning object's lifetime (i.e. something like G_PARAM_READABLE | > > PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY), but GObject does not allow this - at least, it > > didn't work when I tried. > > That's exactly what G_PARAM_READWRITE | G_PARAM_CONSTRUCT_ONLY does if I > am not mistaken. The terminology is a bit confusing. > > Yeti > _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
