---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: frederico schardong <frede.sch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 2009/12/20 Subject: Re: GTK+ is real object oriented? To: David Nečas <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Maybe I had expressed wrong. I don't wanna say that GTK+ NOT IS OO, I'm saying that the way that GTK+ implements the concepts of OO is different. As I say before... "change a attribute (visibility) of a class (gtkwidget) only can be changed by a function (gtk_widget_hide() or (gtk_widget_show()) not by a method". Yes, GTK+ has been construct around OO concepts, buts it have all those concepts that a say before (class, objects, instance, method, inheritance, abstraction, encapsulation, polymorphism)? Because this things a say that's fake (maybe not the correct word). 2009/12/20 David Nečas <yeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 03:40:34PM -0200, frederico schardong wrote: >> The difference is that not a really object-oriented, is a fake object-oriented. >> >> I call it fake object-oriented environment, maybe not the most >> correctly name, but i think is true. >> >> What do you think? > > I think you still did not give any definition of what real and fake > means. At least for you since others will likely disagree whatever the > definition is. > > So again, it is built around OO concepts and behaves like an OO > environment. How can you tell it is a fake? > > Yeti > > -- Thanks, Frederico Schardong, SOLIS - Open source solutions www.solis.coop.br Linux registered user #500582 -- Thanks, Frederico Schardong, SOLIS - Open source solutions www.solis.coop.br Linux registered user #500582 _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
