--- On Wed, 2/25/09, nazgul33 <nazgul33@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: nazgul33 <nazgul33@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: why is cairo with pdf and postscript backend mandatory? > To: "Iulian Iliescu" <iliescu.iulian@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx, gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Wednesday, February 25, 2009, 3:02 AM > Hi Iulian, > > Thank you very much. > I think I need to remove a few tests from GTK+ configure > script as well. > > Sergei, > > Your configure script output tells me that you're > compiling cairo WITH > PDF/PS support. > With that configuration I got no problems. > Seems like you couldn't understand what I am asking > about. > > Steven. > > > 2009/2/25 Iulian Iliescu <iliescu.iulian@xxxxxxxxx> > > > I also build GTK+ (2.12.11 and 2.12.12) without cairo > PDF, PS support > > To be able to do that i made some modification in > source code as follows: > > > > * gtk/gtkprintoperation.c > > * gtk/gtkprintoperation-unix.c > > * modules/printbackends/lpr/gtkprintbackendlpr.c > > * modules/printbackends/file/gtkprintbackendfile.c > > > > i commented out all refereces to: > > > > #include <cairo-pdf.h>#include > <cairo-ps.h> > > cairo_pdf_surface_set_size() > > cairo_pdf_surface_create() > > cairo_ps_surface_create_for_stream() > > > > > > > > Then a make should do the job. > > > > Iulian > > > > > > > > > > nazgul33 wrote: > > > > Hi sergei > > > > current GTK+ configure script finishes with no success > if cairo is not > > compiled with PDF/PS backend. > > Then you might be saying that you modified something? > > > > What did you do to remove the "pdf/ps enabled > cairo" dependency of GTK+? > > Can you share the tip with the group? ;) > > > > 2009/2/25 Sergei Steshenko <sergstesh@xxxxxxxxx> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> --- On Tue, 2/24/09, zentara > <zentara1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > From: zentara <zentara1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > Subject: Re: why is cairo with pdf and > postscript backend mandatory? > >> > To: gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > >> > Date: Tuesday, February 24, 2009, 7:41 AM > >> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 22:52:23 +0900 > >> > nazgul33 <nazgul33@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > >Why pdf/ps backends are mandatory? > >> > >Does anybody know which version of GTK+ > source > >> > distribution has no such > >> > >restriction? > >> > >What can I do to remove the restriction > if i have to > >> > you recent GTK+? > >> > > > >> > >Thanks, > >> > > > >> > >Steven. > >> > > >> > I thought about that myself, ...why does glib > need a > >> > graphic lib? > >> > > >> > My only guess, and I'm no expert, is that > the the low > >> > level gdk windows need it? > >> > > >> > zentara > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > I'm not really a human, but I play one on > earth. > >> > > >> > http://www.zentara.net/~zentaran/My_Petition_to_the_Great_Cosmic_Conciousness.html<http://www.zentara.net/%7Ezentaran/My_Petition_to_the_Great_Cosmic_Conciousness.html> > >> > >> PDF backend is not mandatory - I've been > building without it for years. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Â Sergei. > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> gtk-list mailing list > >> gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ---------------------------- > > nazgul33 > > > > http://nazgul33.com > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gtk-list mailing > listgtk-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > > > > > > > -- > ---------------------------- > nazgul33 > > http://nazgul33.com gtk+ depends on CUPS, that I know. I do not install PDF and PS development headers at system level. My 'configure' output scripts just shows that 'configure' detected 'gs', i.e. 'ghostscript' executable. Regards, Sergei. _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
