--- alex <legars2101@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, I will take a look at ImageMagick... > > Thanks you all > > Le jeudi 27 septembre 2007 à 18:56 +0200, David NeÄ?as (Yeti) a écrit : > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:44:11AM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: > > > > > > Exactly my point. > > > > > > First processing with/at full accuracy, then display at whatever accuracy the display > > > device allows. > > > > I was talking about converting for display -- the idea of > > destroying the valuable original data is so silly that it > > can be probably mentioned only when one attempts to attibute > > it to someone else. I agree anything can be made as > > complicated as one wishes though (since we all know ICC > > profiles of our monitors). The point that you should > > perform the conversion holds. > > > > Yeti > > > > -- > > http://gwyddion.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > > gtk-list mailing list > > gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > > _______________________________________________ > gtk-list mailing list > gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list > The beauty of ImageMagick is that along with conventional programming one can do pretty complex things on command line, albeit slower. For example, I once wrote a sequence of commands implementing "unsharp mask" on color images - it is not that trivial in a sense it is not performed on per color bases, but rather on intensity. Whatever and good luck. Regards, Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games. http://sims.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
