Hi David, > Got any opinions on Trolltech's QT 4.x ? (Cross > platformness is key for me) > I've been debating dumping GTK+ altogether and going > to QT for a ground up rewrite of my app because of > these performance issues. (which are atrociously bad > when running certain pixmap themes, I'm seeing > slowdowns as much as 2-4x additional on top of > it'scurrent issues). Yes, QT is in my opinion quite mature and well optimized, but well ... expensive as hell if you don't do GPL'ed stuff. Some time ago I did some tests against QT-3.? and it was surprisingly fast, what I've heard QT-4 is again 20% faster. I don't know how much Java is suited for your task, but some benchmarks I did also showed very good UI performance for applications writting using Java/Swing. Fox is also very fast, but looks quite old: http://fox-toolkit.org/ > C++ will take some getting used to (slightly different > concepts, but I think it would be better overall). Well I don't like both for application development, maybe because my home-language is java ;) But to be honest I guess its way better (also for the generated code) to have OO concepts in the language itself, than to emulate it like GLib does. lg Clemens _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
