--- Michael Ekstrand <mekstran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 09:24 -0700, David J. Andruczyk wrote: > > Though when a widget implementation causes 5-10x more cpu usage > due > > to a bad design. I think it warrants attention. > > > > [suggested fix snipped] > > > > It would solve the cpu usage problem from the resize triggers > and > > not break backwards compat. It's also something that should > have > > been done 3-5 years ago. > > It's open-source software. If this issue is that important to > you, > submit a patch. Criticizing the volunteers working on GTK+, who > evidently haven't found this to be a significant enough issue to > warrant > this kind of attention, isn't a constructive way to promote > change. > I did my part by SUBMITTING BUG REPORTS, several in fact.. I'm an not a GTK+ wizard, nor do I know all the intricacies about how it renders. hence I GAVE them the information ,described the problems, and it was tossed out. -- David J. Andruczyk ____________________________________________________________________________________ We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 _______________________________________________ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@xxxxxxxxx http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
